Here's how my days have been going lately, food wise: I can manage a little bit of something (usually fruit; strawberries or cherries have been staying down) late in the morning, rarely I can manage a mid-afternoon snack, but then in the early evening I can usually mange some of the components of a normal(ish) dinner, and sometimes a snack a couple of hours later (if I'm not throwing up dinner by then
). This is all of course, contingent on my not drinking ANYTHING, because right now if I drink more than a swallow twice a day to get my Pepcid down, I throw everything up. Anyways, the question that occurred to me last night when I was actually HUNGRY and not nauseous at the same time (NOT a combination that happens often) was this:
Is it worse
a: to not be able to eat anything
or
b: to be hungry and not be able to find anything in the house that you think/know will stay down?
I'm leaning toward the second, as, by this point, I'm used to not wanting/not being able to eat. Was wondering what your thoughts were on the subject. . .
