Research on HG's short- and long-term effects is desperately needed and needed now. We need to do more to find a cure for this disease that has such devastating effects on a growing number of soon-to-be mothers.
Congressman Xavier Becerra (CA)
HG forces women to make difficult decisions... the H.E.R. web site is the most comprehensive location to educate oneself to make the best decisions.
Marlena S. Fejzo, PhD USA
HG is a devastating illness and yet so little research has been undertaken into causes and therapies.
Dr. Matthes Seeling, MD
HG is a tremendously debilitating disease that can have life-long consequences. This Web site will provide much needed support to mothers suffering from this disease.
TM Goodwin, MD USA
HG has a devastating personal and family impact and effective management is most important.
Ron Taylor, MD UK
Take a Survey

During how many pregnancies with HG (excessive nausea/vomiting) did you get a false negative pregnancy test at or beyond 28 days even though you were in fact pregnant? (include pregnancies that ended in loss)

0
1-2
3-4
5 or more
Unsure

View Results »
Related Links
  • Merck Manuals
    Information about diseases, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment.
  • eMedicine Clinical Knowledge Base
    Online medical journals, textbooks, physician reference articles, and patient education.
  • Pub Med
    A service of the National Library of Medicine, providing access to over 12 million MEDLINE citations and additional life science journals.

Rhodes Index Assessment Tool

There are many assessment tools for measuring the severity of nausea and vomiting.

Quoted from State of the Art 2000: International consensus on standards for studying the efficacy of pharmacological therapies for nausea and vomiting of pregnancy.

A major issue in interpreting and comparing studies on the management of NVP has been the use of numerous different methods to qualify and quantify nausea, vomiting and related symptoms. Different researchers have arbitrarily defined NVP as "mild", "moderate" or "severe" without clear quantitative definitions or biological logic.

Often the assessments have been retrospective. In some cases end points were measured dichotomously as success/failure or as percentage preferring one drug over the other (in crossover studies). While these approaches may be reasonable in randomised control trials (RCTs), assuming that all arms of the studies are evaluated similarly, the clinical interpretation of arbitrary endpoints and comparison between studies becomes difficult, if not impossible.

We feel that future studies should use a standard, validated tool that will allow comparison among studies.

The Rhodes Index appears to be an optimal tool for this purpose. It separately scores, as categorical variables, the number of vomiting episodes per day, the size of the vomiting, the degree and length of nausea and retching, as well as the distress associated with the condition (Table 1). The inventory can be done once or twice a day and, in addition to an overall score, one can report separately on the frequency and changes in nausea, vomiting, retching and stress.

TABLE 1: RHODES INDEX OF NAUSEA, VOMITING AND RETCHING

Updated on: Mar. 24, 2010

The HER Foundation is not affiliated, connected, or associated with any other HG-specific charitable foundations. HER Foundation does not sponsor, approve, or otherwise endorse any other HG-specific charitable foundations.
Copyright © 2000-2011 H.E.R. Foundation • 932 Edwards Ferry Rd, #23 • Leesburg, VA 20176