by nikki0072004 » Apr 24, 2005 1:21 pm
I voted for four times for me, that includes the preganncies I lost.
Pamela and Co: Did you mean that nurse said you cant have HG with a pregnancy that is destined to miscarry? OR that HG would not cause you to miscarry? I wil answer as if you mean the last one, but if you mean the first, please forgive me.
I am seeing a Peri for this pregnancy, and he made me go over like 5 hours worth of sexual/female history to get a good idea for this pregnancy. I lost my first child, Jack, at 22 weeks. He died in-utero. That pregnancy was my worst HG pregnancy, I was young, and alone and had NO medical drug intervention for HG, I was being seen at a free clinic, and they didnt really deal with things like that. I had one rehydration at 10 weeks. I think I lost about 25-30lbs. For many years I assumed it was a loss due to HG, since I coudlnt see how it could have survived without nutrition.
My Peri assures me that this is a physical impossibility, and that my HG had NOTHING to do with the loss. He said that the baby would take so many nutrients from me, that I would literally go into heart/renal/system failure before a baby was lost due to lack of nutrition or dehydartion etc.
So, I did want to reassure anyone who has this concern. Of course 99% of people have far better care than I was receiving at the time. But its still a nice thought, since we would all go thru anything it took as long as we know its not affecting the baby, right?
Again, if this is not what you meant, I am sorry.
Nikki